Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177507 ------- Additional Comments From che666@xxxxxxxxx 2006-02-08 04:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > - This > >Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]") > is not needed anymore -- works automatically in FC4 and later alright thats cleaned up now. > - Don't repeat the name of the package in the beginning of the summary cosmetical fix done ;) > - The license doesn't look like GPL its MIT... fixed > - Description needs a linebreak after 80 chars linebreaks done > - Description might be a bit to long gotta recheck that. shouldnt be a big problem to make it shorter > - Change > Requires: desktop-file-utils > to > BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils thats correct and fixed now > - In the future please add versions in the changelog also done > - why "Release: 0.2" and not "Release: 2"? this has multible reasons. first i dont want to give the impression that the package is yet really production ready and second of all i wanted to start of with a clean -1 release once its approved. in my eyes pida is very promising software but very young yet so it can definitely use some love and care already. 0.3.1 is a useable release if the embedded vim editor is used. > - saw those warnings when starting pida: > which: no pydoc in > (/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/rpmbuild/usr/bin:/home/rpmbuild/server/usr/bin) > which: no xemacs in > (/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/rpmbuild/usr/bin:/home/rpmbuild/server/usr/bin) > Are they relevant? optional components. pida is a framework. > - In the future please upload the srpms somewhere to the web and post only post > links to it -- don't attach the packages in bugzilla alright but unfortunately thats the reason why i dont have the src rpm up yet. > > (In reply to comment #5) > > list of known issues: > > - usually bicyclerepair would be required to load the python plugins but i left > > the dependencys out since the plugins (browser/profiler/debugger) dont load > > anyways. (will be fixed with 0.3.0) > > I would add it nevertheless seems to be not even required anymore. but i will talk back to upstream. going to clear up the issue until the next src rpm upload. TODO: 1) do something with the stuff in docs/ folder... maybe it would be nice to pdf those html manuals. suggestions? 2) get the vim problem fixed (actually i had problems to get the external vim editor going) 3) build install and split off the in extras/ included gazpacho plugin 4) report all found issues to upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
