Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177507 ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-21 10:48 EST ------- - This >Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]") is not needed anymore -- works automatically in FC4 and later - Don't repeat the name of the package in the beginning of the summary - The license doesn't look like GPL - Description needs a linebreak after 80 chars - Description might be a bit to long - Change Requires: desktop-file-utils to BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils - In the future please add versions in the changelog entrys - why "Release: 0.2" and not "Release: 2"? - saw those warnings when starting pida: which: no pydoc in (/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/rpmbuild/usr/bin:/home/rpmbuild/server/usr/bin) which: no xemacs in (/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/rpmbuild/usr/bin:/home/rpmbuild/server/usr/bin) Are they relevant? - In the future please upload the srpms somewhere to the web and post only post links to it -- don't attach the packages in bugzilla (In reply to comment #5) > list of known issues: > - usually bicyclerepair would be required to load the python plugins but i left > the dependencys out since the plugins (browser/profiler/debugger) dont load > anyways. (will be fixed with 0.3.0) I would add it nevertheless -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
