Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 ------- Additional Comments From Nicolas.Mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-02-05 05:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Generally you should supply a src.rpm; it makes the review process a bit easier > and some of the review items require having it. I know, it's just that my isp changed it's upload rules and I couldn't locate the new ones yesterday > My rpmlint complains: > W: perl-Font-TTF wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/perl-Font-TTF-0.37/README.TXT > > and indeed README.TXT has CRLF endings. However, there are several packages > which include documentation files with DOS-style line endings so I don't believe > this is a blocker. Fix it up if you like. It's as you want, the rpmlint in rawhide does not care > Other issues: > I can't review spec file naming. > I can't review the source used to build the SRPM as none was provided. > BuildRequires: perl is not permitted. This line is straight from the fedora-rpmdevtools-1.4-2.fc5 perl template. Is the template wrong ? > The license does not seem to be GPL. I see only: > The Perl TTF module is licensed under the Perl Artistic License. Ok, my mistake, copied the licensing in dries rpm without checking > I don't understand this comment in the %files section: > # For arch-specific packages: vendorarch This is a bit of fedora-rpmdevtools-1.4-2.fc5 perl template I should have snipped > I can't install the resulting RPM: > > error: Failed dependencies: > perl(Win32) is needed by perl-Font-TTF-0.37-1.noarch > perl(Win32::Registry) is needed by perl-Font-TTF-0.37-1.noarch > > I believe this is the result of lib/Font/TTF/Win32.pm. I'm not sure what would > be best to do here. You can fix it with a quick > > rm %{buildroot}/%{perl_vendorlib}/Font/TTF/Win32.pm > > in the %install section but I'm not completely sure if that's acceptable. I agree on this, will do > Another solution would be to postprocess the output of the dependency generator, > but that's rather unpalatable as well (and more complicated than just deleting > the file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
