Patrice Dumas (pertusus@xxxxxxx) said: > > it brings up a good question: is it reasonable to consider a similar > > "non-free" repo for things like this that are (a) explicitly > > redistributable, but (b) not free? > > There are things like that on livna. Well, yes, but it might be useful to separate the things that are redistributable-everywhere-but-don't-meet-the-explicit-criteria vs. other things. Bill -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
