Re: Povray, fedora extras and licensing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

> BTW: Debian has povray-3.5 in "stable", but classifies it as "non-free".

Yep.

>From the reactions I've heard so far, sounds like a big "no" to me -- and
it brings up a good question: is it reasonable to consider a similar
"non-free"  repo for things like this that are (a) explicitly
redistributable, but (b)  not free?

Not sure how I stand on that.

--g

---------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Foundation || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
---------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux