Greg DeKoenigsberg (gdk@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > BTW: Debian has povray-3.5 in "stable", but classifies it as "non-free". > > Yep. > > >From the reactions I've heard so far, sounds like a big "no" to me -- and > it brings up a good question: is it reasonable to consider a similar > "non-free" repo for things like this that are (a) explicitly > redistributable, but (b) not free? > > Not sure how I stand on that. Hm, well, I could see something like that being useful, for, say, firmware. Bill -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
