Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Nobody complained so loudly before -- why suddenly? All *I* requested is
to link this bug to the tracker bug -- that takes only 5 seconds per
bug. This whole discussion took much more time already.
"All Fesco does with this rule" would probably be more suitable -- so
okay, I you guys don't like that "MUST" rule then we can try to revisit
it and modify it. See the other mail to Hans I wrote some minutes ago
for details.
Speaking only for myself:
The problem is not the tracker bug it is your clarification / reply to
my initial question if this should be done in all cases. In practice
reviewers have been handling it as suggested in your reply to my second
mail this thread. It is not necessary to write down every exception in
the guidelines / procedures, it is necessary to allow for interpretation
room, your reply took the room (which I thought was there for
interpretation) away.
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
