Re: New tracker bugs for the use of ExcludeArchs in packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 13:29 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2006, 13:32 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede:
> > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> > What if the ExclusiveArch is not a bug but a feature, for example say a 
> > userspace support tools for certain hardware only found on certain 
> > archs? Then there is no problem to fix, should one then still file bugs?
> 
> In the past I would have said "no" but a lot of other packagers
> disagreed and convinced me -- so the answer is a "yes" from me now.
Please explain, I fail to understand the rationale.

> Other people simply might not know that the package is "for certain
> hardware only found on certain archs".
It already is: Inside of the spec. All you do is adding administration
overhead.

Ralf


-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux