On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 14:05 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Nasrat <pnasrat@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Paul> On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 12:38 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> This is due to the fact that a package with a Epoch of 0 is always > >> considered to be newer than a package with no Epoch at all. > > Paul> This is not true anymore, and hasn't been since rpm 4.2.1. > > Dho. You are quite right. :( I thought it was still the case... There's at least one more case where it still is, rpm -F. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/143301 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
