On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 12:38 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > In the process of doing a mass rebuild here of all extras packages for > current devel/fc5 under mock I ran into an interesting issue: > > The following packages were released at some point with a "Epoch: 0" > set. If you have EVER release a package with an Epoch, you need to > keep that around forever after if you expect updates to work. > > This is due to the fact that a package with a Epoch of 0 is always > considered to be newer than a package with no Epoch at all. This is not true anymore, and hasn't been since rpm 4.2.1. Paul -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
