Re: Some comments about FE-ACCEPT'ed packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 04:35 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 27.01.2006, 22:09 -0500 schrieb Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams:
> > On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 04:01 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > > I don't have a rawhide box here... I tried libX11-devel,
> > > xorg-x11-proto-devel but no success.
> > 
> > That's what mock is for.
> > 
> 
> Yes. I know that I can change the mock config to devel, but...
> 
> mock builds from a srpm. How do I build this srpm with builddeps to
> packages that are not available in core 4?
> 
> (Maybe this is a stupid question...)

You examine config.log et al in the mock buildroot in order to figure
out what packages are required.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux