Hi all, I whipped up a small Perl script to analyze FE-ACCEPT'ed packages. Here are the raw conclusions so far: --- We have 18 accepted, closed packages where I'm unable to find the package in the development repo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=165488,168185,171601,172136,172144,172150,172151,173216,173548,173549,173550,173552,173553,173661,174266,175848,176467,177083 We have 434 accepted, closed package reviews Top 10 packagers: tcallawa at redhat dot com : 43 rc040203 at freenet dot de : 41 andreas dot bierfert at lowlatency.de : 28 jpo at di dot uminho.pt : 22 fedora dot wickert at arcor.de : 18 rdieter at math dot unl.edu : 14 orion at cora dot nwra.com : 13 pertusus at free dot fr : 13 paul at city-fan dot org : 11 ivazquez at ivazquez dot net : 11 Top 10 reviewers: paul at city-fan dot org : 62 gauret at free dot fr : 58 gdk at redhat dot com : 33 tcallawa at redhat dot com : 24 jpmahowald at gmail dot com : 24 rc040203 at freenet dot de : 22 jpo at di dot uminho.pt : 19 adrian at lisas dot de : 18 ed at eh3 dot com : 18 ville dot skytta at iki.fi : 13 We have 9 accepted, open package reviews where the package appears to already be in the repo... All open packages already available: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=166207,166251,166252,166253,166254,168905,171334,171336,177166 --- I suspect gdk's good score as a reviewer stems from the fact that some reviewers forget to assign the bugs to themselves... If people could have a quick look at the bug lists and: - close the tickets where teh package is available in the repo - ponder why their package is not in the devel repo in the other cases I guess that'd be nice :-) Cheers, Christian P.S. I'm happy to put my (very blunt) script somewhere, but I'm not sure where would be the most appropriate... -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
