Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx 2006-01-26 08:47 EST ------- > Good to know there is a policy about this. Kevin Kofler, can you say if > there's also policy for the gui package name issue and the rpm version > number issue? A policy would define what to do here so we would not have > to argue about this matter. I don't think there is, otherwise it would have been brought up already by the people knowing more than me. ;-) > - Shouldn't smart-usermode obsolete smart-update and not ksmarttray? I > might be wrong but if you just read the decriptions you get that impression. Other ksmarttray packages are linked against smart-update, so doing what you suggest could cause conflicts. Obsoleting it in ksmarttray doesn't have that problem. > - Same goes for "install". Perhaps use the macro instead? > > - You use "touch" there. Shouldn't you require /bin/touch then? Or is there a > macro for it instead? > > - You use "test" there. The same thing here. Either there is a macro or you > should require "/usr/bin/test". I think these are base tools which can be assumed to just be there. > - You use "gtk-update-icon-cache". Shouldn't you require > "/usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache" then? That makes sense (if it isn't already being required - it's part of the gtk2 package), it should be a Requires(post) though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
