On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:27 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > "Business considerations that prevented certain Mono components from > > > being included in Fedora previously have now been resolved." > > > This doesn't answer my question. RH business considerations are > > irrelevant here. We are having a legal problem here, which we needs to > > be clarified to protect ourselves and FE's users. > > > > I (as most other people outside of the Fedora Foundation or Red Hat) > > > don't know more details. > > > Great, ... master piece of communication with RH ... ;) > > > > How about you asking your predecessor GDK, on behalf of FESCO? > > > > http://fedora.redhat.com/About/contact.html lists him as the FF's "legal > > inquiries" contact person. > > That *was* my statement, directly from my blog. It's still my statement. > "Business considerations that prevented certain Mono components from being > included in Fedora previously have now been resolved." > > I don't like it. No one likes it, near as I can tell. It is what it is. Superb - I hope you understand, what this makes you and RH look like to me - "Community orientation" definitely looks different. > If and when I can say more, I assure you that I will. OK, then let's take "Mono's role as too uncooked" and postpone all decisions on Mono until you can say more. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
