Re: Mono apps in extras

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

> > "Business considerations that prevented certain Mono components from
> > being included in Fedora previously have now been resolved."

> This doesn't answer my question. RH business considerations are
> irrelevant here. We are having a legal problem here, which we needs to
> be clarified to protect ourselves and FE's users.
 
> > I (as most other people outside of the Fedora Foundation or Red Hat)
> > don't know more details. 

> Great, ... master piece of communication with RH ... ;)
> 
> How about you asking your predecessor GDK, on behalf of FESCO? 
> 
> http://fedora.redhat.com/About/contact.html lists him as the FF's "legal
> inquiries" contact person.

That *was* my statement, directly from my blog.  It's still my statement.  
"Business considerations that prevented certain Mono components from being
included in Fedora previously have now been resolved."

I don't like it.  No one likes it, near as I can tell.  It is what it is.

If and when I can say more, I assure you that I will.

--g

---------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Foundation || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
---------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux