Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmpi - a new MPI implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173719 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun@xxxxxxxxx 2006-01-24 18:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > - Removed Requires: gcc-gfortan. I'm sure many folks will use this without fortran. Most MPI implementations configures and build the fortran module by default, so I guess rpm will pull in the dependency anyway. > - Add Requires(post): /usr/sbin/alternatives. > - Add post/preun scripts to install alternatives. Note that the alternatives > for mpirun and mpiexec can't be used until lam is converted to use alternatives. I've been meaning to submit a patch for lam (in Core) to do this, but have been very busy lately; maybe the Redhat maintainer will be willing to get it going with a patch. > > /usr/bin/ompi_info.openmpi > /usr/bin/orted.openmpi > /usr/bin/orteprobe.openmpi > /usr/bin/orterun.openmpi > > Is anyone other than openmpi going to provide these? I don't think so. > > I dropped the .openmpi suffix option and instead simply renamed the compiler > wrappers and handled the mpirun/mpiexec links via alternatives. > > - Do we want to switch all of the mpi* commands as a unit, or individually. What do you mean by a unit here ? I believe what you have in the src.rpm above is okay, many applications built to use mpi specifically looks for this individual executables. Nice work. Deji PS: Why not just pass -includedir=%{_includedir}/%{name} and -libdir=%{_libdir}/%{name} to the configure flag instead of moving the files around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
