Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmpi - a new MPI implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173719 ------- Additional Comments From orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-24 17:45 EST ------- I've put a 1.0.1 version with a start on using alternatives here: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/openmpi-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Some notes and questions that have arisen: - Used %{version} in Source0 line - Removed Requires: gcc-gfortan. I'm sure many folks will use this without fortran. - Add Requires(post): /usr/sbin/alternatives. - Add post/preun scripts to install alternatives. Note that the alternatives for mpirun and mpiexec can't be used until lam is converted to use alternatives. - Removed %exclude %{_libdir}/debug, unnecessary - Made %sysconfdir stuff %config - Do we really need the .openmpi suffix on the following: /usr/bin/ompi_info.openmpi /usr/bin/orted.openmpi /usr/bin/orteprobe.openmpi /usr/bin/orterun.openmpi Is anyone other than openmpi going to provide these? I dropped the .openmpi suffix option and instead simply renamed the compiler wrappers and handled the mpirun/mpiexec links via alternatives. - Do we want to switch all of the mpi* commands as a unit, or individually. I've done the mpirun/mpiexec as a unit named "mpi" and the compiler wrappers individually here because I think I can imagine wanting different fortran compilers on different machines and I'm not sure we can split an alternatives unit between two sub-packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
