Re: Maintainership of 2 orphaned packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 13:12 +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Chris Chabot wrote:
> > I'd be willing to take over:
> > 
> > 	themes-backgrounds-gnome
> > 	gnome-themes-extras
> > 
> > Recently added to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages 
> > 
> > Opened bugs for these here:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178011
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178012
> 
> Sorry, if I missed it but since when are bugs opened for change of
> maintainership? According to the wiki I it didn't change and what I
> don't understand is: who will work and close these bugs?
> 
> The only sentence in the wiki about bugzilla is:
> 
> "open bug reports in bugzilla where package owner's attention is
> needed."

My reading of the wiki is that if the package is orphaned for less than
10 days, a bugzilla should be opened so that it can be discussed on the
list before ownership is taken.

Well, actually it says

"For a package that is listed here for less than 10 days, volunteers for
package ownership are collected here for a week. This gives some time
for discussing (also among the volunteers) which of multiple volunteers
will be the primary package owner or how to team up."

The discussion bit for packages orphaned less than 10 days seems to
imply a bugzilla to me, as the wiki page isn't really set up for
discussion, but :shrug:

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux