Re: Maintainership of 2 orphaned packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I just thought it was a nice way to have a central place for possible
discussions, and wanted to search for bug reports and add them as
dependencies (turns out there are no open bugs at all :-))

On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 13:25 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:12:33 +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Chris Chabot wrote:
> > > I'd be willing to take over:
> > > 
> > > 	themes-backgrounds-gnome
> > > 	gnome-themes-extras
> > > 
> > > Recently added to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages 
> > > 
> > > Opened bugs for these here:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178011
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178012
> > 
> > Sorry, if I missed it but since when are bugs opened for change of
> > maintainership? According to the wiki I it didn't change and what I
> > don't understand is: who will work and close these bugs?
> > 
> > The only sentence in the wiki about bugzilla is:
> > 
> > "open bug reports in bugzilla where package owner's attention is
> > needed."
> 
> The full sentence is:
> 
> "... and join (or re-assign to you) open bug reports in bugzilla where
> package owner's attention is needed."
> 
> Which means that somebody, who plans to take over maintainership
> of a package, ought to query bugzilla for any open tickets and then
> re-assign them or join Cc.
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux