Re: Subpackages with different architectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 14:52 +0330, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 14:47 -0500, Ed Hill wrote:
> > And by splitting into noarch and arch-specific you can let
> > users choose whether they want the math support and its additional
> > dependencies or not.
> 
> I can't say I understand how does splitting into noarch and
> arch-specific can let the users choose. Do you mean by splitting into
> subpackages, or am I missing something here?

Yes, I meant subpackages.

Ed

-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Rm 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
             Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails:  eh3@xxxxxxx                ed@xxxxxxx
URLs:    http://web.mit.edu/eh3/    http://eh3.com/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux