Ah and so it is, the broken yum headers/checksums fooled me into thinking it wasn't Thanks :-) On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 11:57 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Chris Chabot wrote: > > > > > >>Is it safe and ok to package this for Fedora? Seems to be a much more > >>free licence, and allows distribution of the source/compiled package, so > >>should be ok right? > > > > > > boost itself is in either core or extras, I do not know which. > > boost is in Core. > > -- Rex > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
