Re: Question about licence for "boost" libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ah and so it is, the broken yum headers/checksums fooled me into
thinking it wasn't

Thanks :-)

On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 11:57 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Chris Chabot wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>Is it safe and ok to package this for Fedora? Seems to be a much more
> >>free licence, and allows distribution of the source/compiled package, so
> >>should be ok right?
> > 
> > 
> > boost itself is in either core or extras, I do not know which.
> 
> boost is in Core.
> 
> -- Rex
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux