> You could think of Sugar as a desktop environment like KDE or GNOME > (architecturally, it is sort of a cousin to GNOME). There is more to > it than that, but it'll do for starters. > > It should be possible (in the future) to allow a student to chose > whether to log into GNOME or Sugar on a LTSP terminal. It also should > be possible to allow them to run Sugar as an application within their > regular GNOME session, in full screen or windowed mode. > > Sugar is extensible through its own packaging system. > > And it is certainly not flat; if it fails, it will be because they're > trying to go too deep. Thanks for the explanation, I thought of Sugar more as an OS and not just a window manager. Very cool. Tom, maybe you could get Indiana on board and bring OLPC to the US :-) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by the Cotter Technology Department, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Fedora-education-list mailing list Fedora-education-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-education-list
