On 9/29/18 5:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Differences_to_Ubuntu > > The part about sudo is very out of date (we _do_ now configure sudo by > default, and have for a very long time), and the part about dnf is a mess. > > The part about "using apt anyway" should be removed, since it really doesn't > work. > > The life cycle part could be written in a more positive way, and could > emphasize ease of upgrades. > > There's probably more stuff. We can talk about GNOME Shell, and also about > Fedora Server and Fedora Atomic Host / CoreOS. > > So, yeah, all of that, plus of course update to new docs site and put the > wiki redirect macro in place. > > Anyone interested? This'd be particularly useful for someone who does a lot > of playing with other distros. (We could use similar for Mint, Debian, and > Arch as well.) > > This does not answer your original question, but are we triaging / collecting a list of pages like this, where we want more attention / review by others? If not, where can we collect these? I want to collect examples like this we could point people to for making a first contribution to Fedora Docs. I am thinking ahead to when CommOps revisits this ticket in 2019 to try and drive more contributions to Fedora Docs: https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issue/159 A list (or tickets) of docs pages that need love or wiki pages that are good candidates for migration to quick-docs is a helpful resource. It simplifies planning for this ticket. -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
