Re: Docs FAD: What can we "bring"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, Feb 19, 2018, at 5:34 PM, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Part of the Docs FAD purpose¹ includes a contributor handbook; in
> CommOps, we are discussing guidelines for GSoC / Outreachy mentors in
> documentation. Is work like this included in the scope of the FAD?

It can be.  Our hope was to work more on consumer docs, but I don't see why some community focused docs wouldn't be appropriate.  It is a working session after all.

I don't know how much "brainstorming" time you can get or is appropriate though.

regards,

bex

> We have a few docs-related areas of focus in CommOps and I hoped to work
> at them during the FAD². However, the scope of work for the FAD is
> unclear to me in this way, if the FAD is meant to focus on tasks like this.
> 
> More context is in this ticket:
> 
>     https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issue/133
> 
> I want to make sure my expectations are in line with reality for the
> FAD, but didn't want to assume. Does it make sense for participants to
> "bring" tasks like this into the FAD?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> ¹ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Documentation_2018#Purpose
> ² https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/issue/11
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Justin W. Flory
> jflory7@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> _______________________________________________
> docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Email had 1 attachment:
> + signature.asc
>   1k (application/pgp-signature)
_______________________________________________
docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux