Re: Changing docs.stg.fp.o and docs.fp.o

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 10:52 +0200, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was talking with Matthew Miller and we believe that we should
> change
> the way our publishing process stages.  Specifically, we should have
> the
> new CI job that does publishing push updates to both docs.stg.fp.o
> and
> docs.fp.o at the same time.
> 
> Fedora infrastructure republishes docs.stg.fp.o approximately every 5
> minutes and they republish docs.fp.o once per hour.  By pushing to
> both
> we are creating a situation where accepted changes go live
> faster.  In
> general we have time to catch any staging errors with a new publish,
> and
> in the case where we miss it, the site is republished an hour later
> anyway.
> 
> What do you all think?
> 
> regards,
> 
> bex

Using CI to push out changes was a part of the plan that we came up
with at the FAD and I think it is important. The only reason that I
have not pushed for it yet was that things are still in flux. Bex, as
the person with the best understanding of the code and what major
changes are still pending I think you are in the best position to know
when it makes sense to implement this. My worry so far has been pushing
 fundamental changes to the site that break something, if you think we
are past that point then I am a +1 for sure.

Zach 
_______________________________________________
docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux