Re: Changing docs.stg.fp.o and docs.fp.o

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/26/2017 08:56 AM, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, at 02:52 PM, Eduard Lucena wrote:
>> Hi team,
>>
>>     I was talking with Matthew Miller and we believe that we should change
>>     the way our publishing process stages.  Specifically, we should
>>     have the
>>     new CI job that does publishing push updates to both docs.stg.fp.o and
>>     docs.fp.o at the same time.
>>
>>
>> This sounds good!
>>  
>>
>>     Fedora infrastructure republishes docs.stg.fp.o approximately every 5
>>     minutes and they republish docs.fp.o once per hour.  By pushing to
>>     both
>>     we are creating a situation where accepted changes go live faster.  In
>>     general we have time to catch any staging errors with a new
>>     publish, and
>>     in the case where we miss it, the site is republished an hour later
>>     anyway.
>>
>> Wow, that's fast! If we can push this hourly to prod, we will be doing
>> great!
> 
> Infrastructure implemented this for us a couple of months ago.  We can
> do this today, we just have a manual build process.  docs.stg.fp.o is
> updated with a new design and will probably go live to docs.fp.o soon.
> 
> Take a look at provide some feedback :)
> 

I am +1. Anywhere we can automate where it makes sense sounds logical to
me. I would imagine some amount of mistakes are probably fixed shortly
after publication anyways, which fits this model.

-- 
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflory7@xxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux