I'm thinking about how stale we want to let a book get before we stop publishing it. Right now, the de-facto policy is to stop maintaining a guide for a release when the release goes EOL, but on migrating to a new publishing system, we'll have to decide if we want to republish _everything_. It seems like publishing the currently maintained versions, plus the release under development, plus the most recently EOL'd release, should be enough. Early adopters are covered, stragglers are covered for their upgrade, stubborn EOL users get the appropriate amount of support, and nobody gets really stale, potentially incorrect or harmful instructions. I'm throwing this on the agenda to discuss at the next meeting, if you can't make it, please reply here. Also, is there some number of participants we consider a quorum for voting during meetings? We don't do a lot of voting, but it seems like a good thing to establish. -- -- Pete -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
