On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:50:49 +0200 Petr Kovar <pkovar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:12:04 -0400 > Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 16:52 +0200, Petr Kovar wrote: > > \ > > > It could be gnome-documents as Matthias proposed if we choose to ship PDF > > > instead of a bunch of HTML pages. > > > > > > It could be yelp as it supports transforming DocBook/Mallard XML as well as > > > viewing HTML pages. I just tested it and yelp works quite well: > > > > > > $ yelp /usr/share/doc/fedora-release-notes/index.html > > > > I think all of these questions about formats and tools are a bit > > secondary though. > > I agree that these are secondary as long as desktop users can find what they > are looking for. Providing a docs search functionality would surely help > with that need. > > > Having the release notes on the system really makes most sense if we > > actually make an effort to present them to the user when he would be > > most interested in seeing them - right after installation. > > +1 > > > The current post-install workflow already launches yelp with the > > gnome-getting-started guide. Maybe that page can be expanded to include > > the release notes in some form ? > > Yes, this is something we can do. Assuming that we want to provide a > link to the Release Notes from the GNOME Getting Started landing page, > there are multiple ways to approach this. As I said, we could add the > link upstream and use Mallard conditionals to only display the link on > Fedora since the link is downstream-specific. We could also provide a > downstream patch but translations would be a problem then. I filed an upstream bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736511 to track this change. Please leave your comments there. Cheers, pk -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
