On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:20:23AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 06/29/2011 10:02 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:24:36PM -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Pamela Chestek <pchestek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> I thought the consensus was to have a copyright notice that listed the > >>> owner as "Fedora Project contributors"? > >> I thought it was as well. I'm no attorney (and don't play one on IRC > >> or email), but I don't see a pressing reason *not* to have a copyright > >> notice. > > I don't see a pressing reason not to have one if the one Pam suggested > > is acceptable. > > Precisely.. Legalese should be avoided as much as possible. Can we take > this uniform, consistent approach and apply it to other places like the > installer, website, media artwork etc instead of doing it for the docs? As a replacement specifically for "Red Hat, Inc. and others" where the latter happens to be used today, in Fedora contexts? Sure (though I assume that is off-topic for this list). Indeed I have already suggested it for the website in the thread you started on the advisory-board list. It shouldn't necessarily replace *other* forms of copyright notices that exist in the Fedora universe. The specific issue is the Gilligan's Island copyright notice, nothing else. -- Richard E. Fontana Open Source Licensing and Patent Counsel Red Hat, Inc. -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
