On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:31:11PM -0400, Christopher Antila wrote: > I hadn't previously noticed the biggest issue here, which is the hypothetical > situation where another group wants to re-use Fedora Docs material. If, for > example, Ubuntu wanted to re-release the Musicians' Guide, they would try to > write a CC-BY-SA attribution statement, and find the following text on the > front page of the Guide: > > "Christopher Antila > Fedora Documentation Project > crantila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > - ------------------------------------------------- > Legal Notice > Copyright (c) 2011 Red Hat, Inc. and others" > > To whom would Ubuntu attribute the document? Reading a little further into the > Legal Notice, we see this: > > "The original authors of this document, and Red Hat, designate the Fedora > Project as the "Attribution Party" for purposes of CC-BY-SA." > > For me, this clears up the question of attribution. But what of the Red Hat > copyright notice? CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported requires the licensee-distributor to "keep intact all copyright notices". - RF -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
