Re: Docs QA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello:

I absolutely agree with the need for a better QA process, and I also support 
the proposed actions here. This particular process would also make it easy for 
people to contribute when they have time/interest, and let other people pick 
up the slack when they don't have time/interest.


Christopher

> Message: 10
> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:59:52 -0400
> From: "Eric H. Christensen" <sparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Docs QA
> To: docs-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20110403205952.GA26169@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed
> 
> Not enough information to check signature validity.  Show Details
> 
>   A while back we discussed putting together a group of editors that would
>   review changes and guides to make sure they were correct and written
>   well.  Since then little has happened.  The biggest issue has been extra
>   cycles in peoples' day and I can appreciate that.  This is an important
>   task that anyone with a little time can help out with.  It's especially
>   good for newbies that want to become involved but aren't familiar with
>   DocBook and the like as they can see what we are writing and how we are
>   writing.
> 
> With that said, I'd like to propose the following:
> 
> 1) We change the QA on all components in BZ to docs-qa@xxxxxx so interested
> QAers can subscribe to that list and see when QA is needed.  We also need
> to setup docs-qa in BZ and maybe have it send a message only when the the
> ticket is set to MODIFIED and ON_QA (I think this is possible).
> 
> 2) Create a wiki page outlining the purpose and mission of docs-qa and
> provide guidelines for what to check for.
> 
> 3) Create a wiki page outlining the guidelines for QA in the bug-handling
> process.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> --Eric
> 
>   End of signed message
>   ------------------------------
> 
> --
> docs mailing list
> docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNml7oAAoJEInCktGVqZ8VBOIIAIVe/FiTKAnD7/k+mwcaMv7T
pq7e6wH+QLEtD2IHI82wUTy6I4Svr87XaxwDhhwTWcxszQm5LWi1eX2UiLo5c+qY
2SSqu0AFI+AhSKrrHcr/Uq4VzpKcqvZEyRoyXwo9LEjRWQUjfkOkKYs74kxIERvZ
JZG0911ceUPIVzfMa4nkA87mpwZFrXCmD/A+XubhwmiQpLn3r2rDZdTo8FzOlXqY
6/4qx5nUun8r4PJWk5jS5xmNk96uB1x2OXQAY3qs3T94Za5tJZ0XG3h8qdY/vD7i
KuzDJBFSdl4VmXyhGeOMjNzNFzVzJ5w+rU0s2PBhZTS6IZpLwjTTzYm62ZH8kWw=
=tzto
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
docs mailing list
docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux