Re: Do we need a documentation application?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 02:25:44PM -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 06:02:38PM +0000, Mike Danko wrote:
> > Most if not all of the answers will find their place upstream, but
> > I'd think its about time to at the very least question the
> > behavior so the engineering decisions can have a basis.
> > 
> Well, right now upstream is not giving us answers and if anything is
> just creating new problems for us (read that to mean "moving
> target").  I agree that we should go with upstream solutions but
> sometimes we have to provide those solutions to upstream for
> inclusion.  Fedora is somewhat unique in that most distros don't
> have documentation, outside of application help, in their OSs so
> this generally isn't a problem.  We may be the only people to
> find/suggest a solution for upsteam uses.

Can you point me to the discussions that didn't get answers, so I can
help poke at them?

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Red Hat Summit/JBossWorld -- Register now!  http://.theredhatsummit.com
-- 
docs mailing list
docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux