On 02/21/2011 06:25 AM, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > On 02/21/2011 02:40 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote: >> >> First, let me say - I'm happy as long as the work gets done to make >> a Transifex instance usable and maintained for translators. > > Thanks Ricky :) > >> But one question - can you quantify exactly what we lose with switching to >> transifex.net? > > As I see it, you answer your own question further down your post. We > lose control of the instance. Whether or not the Fedora project ever > exercises that control is a different matter. > > Some people might see this as a purely theoretical distinction, but it's > a distinction that exists at the very heart of Free software. With the > exception of packages that I'm involved in maintaining, I have very > rarely delved into the code or modified the code of the Free software > that I use every day. However, by choosing Free software, I retain the > ability to do these things if and when I choose to do so. > > To me, this situation is analogous, and it's important to me that Fedora > retains this freedom. Freedom means having the power to do something, > not that you necessarily do that thing. +1 I completely agree with Rudi. An own infrastructure is always better because it *can* be adjusted for the needs of the project if needed. Thanks, Luc -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
