On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:05:13AM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote: > On 12/02/2010 09:27 AM, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: > > On 12/02/2010 11:18 AM, John J. McDonough wrote: > >> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:02 -0500, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: > >>> On 12/02/2010 10:41 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > >>>> Bad. Really, really bad. RPM installations/updates must never tinker > >>>> with user data AFAIK. The bookmarks package is only useful for new > >>>> users, and not for existing users. > >> I kinda suspected that. > >> > >>> So the bookmark is wrong and useless. We should just have the Release > >>> Notes removed from the bookmarks if this will never be able to be fixed. > >> No, future versions of fedora-bookmarks COULD have the correct URL. It > >> would simply require an update each release. > > Except for those that just do an upgrade which will just live with an > > old link. > > > > --Eric > Well, there's not really any other option which does not violate > packaging rules, or cause wailing and gnashing of teeth :( Is there no way to do a link that points to the latest release notes without causing Infrastructure pain? In other words, an http redirect sounds like a solution, but not a fun one. I know the Infra team doesn't like to do them if it can be avoided, due to the maintenance load it induces. (Very reasonable approach.) Any way to do this on the site itself? Is that a Publican request? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
