-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/2010 03:11 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 15:04:42 -0400, > "Eric \"Sparks\" Christensen" <sparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> I was asked, earlier today, why Tor wasn't addressed in the Fedora >> Security Guide. Anyone have any feelings on whether or not addressing >> system would be appropriate for the SG? > > I think the context of the security guide is securing your system. > tor isn't really part of that. tor is for providing anonymity, which really > is a separate topic. And to be properly described really needs a manual > of its own. Putting just a brief discussion about tor in with other > security stuff, has the potential to do more harm than good. Yeah, I understand that. There is a fine line between security and privacy and to do privacy justice it should probably have a guide of its own (probably not a Fedora topic). - --Eric -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMqiitAAoJEDbiLlqcYamxNMQP/200mx/tMyMR9PQrSrNjPBry 4wV4sNfqUlJwl5Rim5aBuE6/maJjtrlGMgHLYLJqy4aYaUEFQpGjYJpR785YJYHH Q99PhPgwNIcrSmZbHQqmZEJ9hMwdoeJKnlOIX+vzw1VcxCiRtY3dLyH7SktE0IW7 kas7wnCW8wCeYav9EJbyAtYyUmlAtNSR/NiXaEqpmMZYTr65/1KFexoZ5SP91DII //yLIiHSJEfEgZ5+5jyl0OBLi3sgZhjIIUYX+GIgcC/XbjeFcHJN46imDUNVfm2i CNuhSaC4yrJyO5w4GvR+VOmzqwfiHjWuylS1gEVMBm1U8ezQfCxzcBw+0zHFOP7M 3x+tC/PQ5aZd4PTNhA0Pou70FTvizcK+DqJbdxridizmmgdmBDMrQnBhlVTw8vWf jiiqCmGctK0SIPZs5I2EjFCft335k8ynLMTiiB9DxteKsA/IB632pH/uMo/UXnQh /S2wIgHDpJOcy39UCJtz9lJVohWSeLNKsCSLqciZgQvIkWf0ZnU1t5SG/ZDB4EVf dNqrk6W0WPq1pG/dvToFZmZ1HJAQjoQ5Ox0HqbxgRkbPNzmXraEmXK9hhJ7FrETk u0cleixiOvA7jS3opS6yLpDkbG1x4RUNt5LcmwZTScQjIs8YitZGxCwV4ks3CAYS LwVmuNgyKFmJ1XJiwxPE =oKX1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
