Greetings folks,
Based on an issue discovered during Fedora 14 Beta testing, the Fedora
QA team is currently discussing how best to address gaps in our test
matrix [1]. The specific bug [2] potentially concerns using the
livecd-iso-to-disk command to write ISO media other than the Live image
to a USB drive.
From looking at the Fedora 13 installation guide, it recommends using
the Live.iso and ...
* liveusb-creator on Windows [3]
* liveusb-creator, livecd-iso-to-disk or dd on Linux [4]
Later in the guide, it recommends using the boot.iso and ...
* livecd-iso-to-disk on Linux [5]
Does anyone know why that last bullet recommends using the boot.iso
instead of the Live.iso? I'm trying to reconcile what is documented and
what is supported by the livecd-tools package. This mail is intended to
cover the documentation.
Thanks,
James
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/134
[2] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/627789
[3]
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Installation_Guide/Making_USB_Media.html#Making_USB_Media-Windows
[4]
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Installation_Guide/Making_USB_Media-UNIX_Linux.html
[5]
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html-single/Installation_Guide/index.html#sect-New_Users-Alternative_Boot_Methods
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
