On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ah, good point. He did that at our request, and it is covered by the > CLA, but even simple courtesy says, let's ask. I take care of that. > So I made a promise last night that I'd actually get something done on the RPM Guide in the near future. It seems everyone is in agreement that we should absorb Maximum RPM into the RPM Guide and get the Guide up-to-date and maintained. Quaid, is Eric Foster-Johnson amenable to the re-licensing that we're forcing on the Guide? Everyone, since this is my first attempt at such work, I'm going to need a lot of help knowing what needs to be changed and how it should look. If you're aware of changes that need to be made, please bombard me with Bugzilla entries or gentle, loving advice via e-mail, etc. I'll hang out in IRC a lot more, too. I know it's been a while since I volunteered to oversee the RPM Guide, and I feel bad that it has continued to be dormant. I do want to start moving it forward, so any help I can get from the seasoned vets would be great. It's about time I started earning my salary here. :-) Thanks, BC -- Ben Cotton -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
