On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:59:14PM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Bewley" > <dlbewley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "For participants of the Documentation Project" > <fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 8:23 PM > Subject: Re: Docs Meeting Log 2009-09-10 > > >> I would suggest that we list the package delta from f11 release date and >> f12. Not from current f11-updates and f12. > > I've convinced myself both ways on this. I think Paul prefers the > latter, so I've avoided tinking about it too hard. I have, however, > saved a primary.sqlite from the F11 release. I had actually considered a > table of changes, perhaps on the wiki, from F11 GA to F11 current. I see > the need for both. In terms of the release notes, really the best delta is F11 GA -> F12 GA. A significant portion of F11 updates come from work done on the F12 branch. If the delta we focus on is from F11 updates -> F12, we'd lose the sense that each forward-looking release cycle is contributing so heavily to advancement. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
