----- Original Message -----
From: "Dale Bewley" <dlbewley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "For participants of the Documentation Project"
<fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: Docs Meeting Log 2009-09-10
The format of this report is less useful than yours is though. Links
back to the upstream page are very nice. This also doesn't compare to
the previous release.
One of the challenges we have is that the alpha was pretty weak. The report
shows the difference between Fedora 11 a week or so ago, and rawhide. I'll
regenerate those tables as we move closer, and hopefully beta will have a
representative collection of packages. As F11 gets more goodness from the
F12 effort, and as we understand what won't make it into F12, I expect the
tables will get shorter, but I can't really guess how significantly. I had
hoped alpha would be somewhat representative of Fedora 12, but it had only
about 20% of the packages, so I had to use rawhide as a best guess.
How did you generate that information? Can that code we placed into the
pkgdb app?
I don't know what the pkgdb app looks like, but the code that created the
tables is in C. Basically, I compare the primary.sqlite between two repos.
Unfortunately, there are a number of manual steps. I had an earlier
version that just made hints for beat writers that was more automatic, but I
kept changing my mind abut what I wanted, and I haven't yet learned how to
code precognition.
--McD
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
