Ian Weller wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:20:55AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> Ian Weller wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:43:32AM -0400, Matthew Daniels wrote: >>>> odfpy07 is packaged, but hasn't been reviewed/accepted. It has a review >>>> request on bugzilla, but that's about the extent of it. I was under the >>>> impression that we didn't even need it anymore because the newer mwlib >>>> would be able to handle the newer odfpy. >>>> >>> That's not true anymore, unfortunately. >>> >> What's needed? Does it need porting to odfpy-0.9, was the previous patch >> rejected upstream, or something else? >> > Previous patch was rejected because of another problem that arose. > http://code.pediapress.com/wiki/ticket/567 > New patch attached to our bugzilla which fixes that problem: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486678 ianweller will kick it upstream. Note that I don't have data to test mw-render. If someone else does, that would cut down on the round-trip time to send these to upstream and back. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
