On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:20:55AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Ian Weller wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:43:32AM -0400, Matthew Daniels wrote: > >> odfpy07 is packaged, but hasn't been reviewed/accepted. It has a review > >> request on bugzilla, but that's about the extent of it. I was under the > >> impression that we didn't even need it anymore because the newer mwlib > >> would be able to handle the newer odfpy. > >> > > That's not true anymore, unfortunately. > > > > What's needed? Does it need porting to odfpy-0.9, was the previous patch > rejected upstream, or something else? > Previous patch was rejected because of another problem that arose. http://code.pediapress.com/wiki/ticket/567 -- Ian Weller <ianweller@xxxxxxxxx> GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36
Attachment:
pgp3gJaTWjVVw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
