Richard Fontana wrote: > The issue about Creative Commons and absence of warranty disclaimers > must reflect either a mistaken reading by us or (less likely, I think) a > misunderstanding of something we said. As far as I can tell, all > Creative Commons licenses have had boilerplate warranty disclaimers > from the get-go. Thanks for clarifying all this. Much appreciated. If I may, I have a couple more questions: * Would you recommend CC-BY-SA or GNU FDL as the choice to go forward with? Which one * Would you recommend a dual licensing strategy or just a single license to switch to? Somewhat out of scope for this discussion, could a future revision of the Fedora CLA have a counter promise from Red Hat to keep the contributions, free and open? Rahul -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
