On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:55:50PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > Red Hat Legal, while tolerant of our OPL stance, would actually much > prefer it if we went to CC-BY-SA for our docs. I've asked them to double > check that this is acceptable to them, and if so, draft up some wording > around how we would like people to give us attribution (that is the real > weakness in CC-BY-SA). > Given that we can find a good way to require those doing that to give us attribution, I'd strongly support using the CC-BY-SA, most notably because it's a more widespread license that I think a lot more people have heard of than the OPL. -- Ian Weller <ianweller@xxxxxxxxx> GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36
Attachment:
pgpHThtMI0vqX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
