On 04/01/2009 09:31 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: >> > make build WITHOUT="en de fr cz" WITH="es" > > Those changes would be to the packaging CVS Makefile.common, I take > it. Interesting, I didn't know there was such a request outstanding. To be fair, I don't know if there is a formal request outstanding, but I know it is something that has been discussed on and off for years. >> > Also, if we're "stuck" on a tool where we are in fear to make changes to >> > improve it or fix bugs, how open source is that tool? >> > >> > I seriously doubt the package committee would endorse an approach that >> > throws hundreds of documentation packages (different only in >> > translation) at the review system, nor do I think it is likely that they >> > would vote to approve guidelines that enables all of these individual >> > packages to be reviewed in one ticket. However, that is just my opinion, >> > and you're certainly welcome to draft a formal proposal. > > Ian mentioned that subpackages can be passed through to bodhi without > implicating all the siblings, which relieves the burden quite a bit. Are you sure about this? This would be news to me, but if it is true, it would mean that the biggest concern around translations in subpackages is minimized. ~spot -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
