On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 08:39:47AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > On 03/31/2009 09:12 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > In which case we're back to being stuck when we try to push those spec > > changes back upstream to Publican, right? > > I wouldn't say "stuck". The changes should be reasonably minimal. I gave > this some thought last night, and it might be something that could be > implemented along with a semi-longstanding feature request with koji: > the ability to pass specific --with or --without options through to the > build task. Each lang could be a --with or --without as needed. With > some Makefile.common love, it could be as easy as: > > make build WITHOUT="en de fr cz" WITH="es" Those changes would be to the packaging CVS Makefile.common, I take it. Interesting, I didn't know there was such a request outstanding. > Also, if we're "stuck" on a tool where we are in fear to make changes to > improve it or fix bugs, how open source is that tool? > > I seriously doubt the package committee would endorse an approach that > throws hundreds of documentation packages (different only in > translation) at the review system, nor do I think it is likely that they > would vote to approve guidelines that enables all of these individual > packages to be reviewed in one ticket. However, that is just my opinion, > and you're certainly welcome to draft a formal proposal. Ian mentioned that subpackages can be passed through to bodhi without implicating all the siblings, which relieves the burden quite a bit. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgp6gnW32xs9M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
