On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 05:42:44PM -0500, Ian Weller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:54:04PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > As far as I know, you can't tell our build systems to only > > release one subpackage, and hold back all the others. So if you want > > to issue an update, you would be forced to issue all languages at > > once, and you push an update on everyone, even people whose content is > > not changing at all. > > > However if the packages do not require each other (makes sense) and they > are subpackages, one can only choose certain subpackages to submit as an > update to Bodhi, IIRC. Ah, this is something I got wrong. The build process would still be tremendously long-winded for a small nugget of actual package we care about, but I suppose that is, in fact, why we use computers to do it and not pencil and paper (or monkeys with typewriters). ;-) There are no such package Requires: AFAIK. Worth factoring into the equation, thanks Ian. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpRE0oTnugKO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
