Two things... 1) How does the Security Guide[1] look using IE? 2) Do we know if the guides are W3C validated? I'll go ahead and answer my #2. I just checked the Security Guide[1] against the W3C Markup Validation Service and received "This document was successfully checked as XHTML 1.0 Strict!". That's right boys and girls, all the code is completely within the spec. I didn't even get a warning or anything. Publican is pushing good html. Which leads to the question, what version of IE are you using? Eric [1] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/security-guide/f10/en_US/ On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 08:39 -0400, John J. McDonough wrote: > Today I made the mistake of looking at the Publican produced release notes > with Internet Explorer. I can't believe it has taken me so long to make > this check, but it wasn't pleasant. They are pretty badly munged up. I > wonder if there are things we can do/set in Publican to straighten this out. > > The first problem is that the first page stops with the logo image. This > eliminates the table of contents and first section. By changing the > chunking in Publican we can get the first section back, but I don't know how > to get the table of contents. And the little box where the logo belongs > looks trashy. I suspect I could modify the branding to use the png version. > I also did a different document with Publican, and all looked fine when I > looked at it on my local box, but when I moved it to a webserver off my LAN > (I believe it is RHEL), a bunch of XML shows up where the logo belongs when > viewed with FF. And it has the same issues with IE. > > Second, every section number is followed by an A circumflex. I suspect this > is some sort of codepage issue, but I can't say I'm sure of that. > > I checked the Fedora 10 release notes, which weren't produced with Publican, > and they are fine. > > I know, why aren't I using Firerox/KonquerorOpera pick your favorite poison. > Fact is, Ryan put together the F11 RN's months ago, and amongst many > experiments, I've probably viewed them a hundred times, with Firefox, Opera, > SeaMonkey, Konqueror, Epiphany; I can't believe it has taken me this long to > look at them with IE. In spite of the inroads Firefox in particular has > made, Internet Explorer is still the big bear in the woods, and it doesn't > look good for Fedora if our documentation looks trashy. > > --McD >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
