On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:02:40AM -0500, Eric Christensen wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 09:11 -0500, Matthew Daniels wrote: > > About two weeks ago, I had mentioned trying to finally finish the F9 > > UG but that there were some chapters that I wasn't in the position to > > fact check. I think Karsten's suggestion that we publish a guide > > without these chapters (those chapters being on KDE and Xfce) actually > > had some merit (1), so that's the plan I'm going with right now. > > You know, I had some of the same problems with some items in the > Security Guide. I went over to #fedora-kde and found a couple of guys > that proofed what I had written and validated it for me. I wonder if we > couldn't get some of the KDE people to come over to the Docs side and > help us out. They have been very helpful in this regard in the past. A ton of KDE content has been written initially by iirc Kevin Kofler. We could also stagger; release without KDE and push KDE in as an update. Early, often, etc. :) - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41
Attachment:
pgp1NlR7nTv2g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
