> I'm actually surprised at Christopher's assessment of the situation. > Is it disingenuous? He works in Red Hat's Content Services group, I > assumed he was aware of the ongoing work from that group to fully open > content that has been only on redhat.com to date. > > https://fedorahosted.org/securityguide/ > https://fedorahosted.org/selinuxguide/ > https://fedorahosted.org/deploymentguide/ [snip] > I haven't added up the number of pages, but it's more than nothing. > Consider that all but the first items from Red Hat were developed > entirely in the community. Sorry to complain :-) "https://fedorahosted.org/selinuxguide/"; was developed entirely in the community. See the archives: <http://www.nsa.gov/research/selinux/list-archive/index.shtml> The SELinux User Guide is not on <http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/>. I might have missed what you were saying, and the community reference above may be referring to fedora documentation or fedora specific mailing lists only. Also, "selinuxguide" may have been referring to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? Cheers. -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
