Sparks, jsmith and I were talking in IRC and I thought the conversation should have a bit wider audience. I think that while kbase and housing documentation for packaging guidelines and legal are excellent use cases for a CMS, I wonder if by trying to use it for everything we are not trying to use a hammer to drive a screw. My reason for saying that is that it seems like we are trying to push all of our non-wiki documentation into the CMS, which at least from my perspectives means we, to one degree or another, are abandoning DocBook. For our 'heavy' documents, such as Release Notes, User Guide, and Security Guide, I don't see an escape from DocBook - it provides a lot of advantages that just don't exist in a CMS. It does have disadvantages to be sure, but I guess the question in my mind is with all of the talk of moving to a CMS are we really prepared to ditch DocBook and it's benefits? Or is the CMS a solution for things like Legal and Packaging Guidelines, and potentially a knowledgebase, and not more? Thoughts, Comments, Flames? -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
